• The game options which will now be accessable while playing a game
• The new “Recent” listing which shows games you’ve recently finished (and games that are adjourned and ready to resume)
• The game browser that lets you play back the moves of games that you’ve recently finished

No firm date on when to expect an update unfortunately, but it will be as soon as possible!

So when I started working with Ollie, there were major differences between the way I used to work and the way this app has been developed.

Some observations:

• Comparing my own designs with a pro’s designs leads to inferiority complex
• When I think something’s done, it’s only halfway there
• The end result is amazingly coherent

It’s also a much more drawn out process as there usually is a number of iterations where an idea turns into a design that finally turns into an implementation. There are usually somewhere between 4-5 rounds of tweaks before we end up with the final implementation.

If one chooses to divide up labour the way Ollie and myself did it, there is a very clean interface between the designer (Ollie) and the implementer (me).

I get designs, screenshots and other specs, and Ollie gets 3-4 builds a week with the latest improvements in them (I usually throw some bugs in there as well to keep things interesting).

(I know Ollie is a very good developer – so going forward we will probably blur the lines a bit more).

So how does this change the dynamics in terms of what one can hope to accomplish? There will always be a trade-off between what is possible, what is desirable, what is acceptable and what the total workload is.

Unless you happen to be have an unlimited R&D budget you will most likely have to decide if you want to have a release that has a lot of features with less TLC per feature or if you want to spend a lot of time perfecting a limited set of features.

I strongly believe that in order for a small group of people (think two!) to be able to develop, maintain and support an application, the latter approach is the one to go for. It’s also a lot more rewarding in the end, one can focus on the next small batch of features and trust the fact that the app is well put together, coherent and doesn’t need a lot of support. The app will stand on it’s own.

The inherent problem with a small set of features is that you won’t have the benefit of the shot-gun feature approach. If your few features aren’t appreciated, then you’ve spent all that time in vain. Which will probably suck a great deal.

This is where working with a good designer will help a great deal. The starting point is usually about what the next useful feature should be and how the user should interface with it, not about what features are simple to implement given the existing code or how one can fit a cool piece of code into the app.

Given everything I’ve written above, how well did myself and Ollie do?

Well – you tell us

We’ve decided to release it as a free app with a paid update to unlock some of the features. This means that you can try the app for free and play unlimited games as a guest. If you upgrade, you’ll unlock the ability to log in as a registered user, play rated games and keep track of your rating.

Unlocking all premium features costs $2.99 (USD)

We’re hoping for around another week of beta before we submit to the app store. It’s getting close!

We’re looking for beta testers who can help us iron out the last few bugs in the app. You get to check out the app before anyone else, and you’ll get a free copy once we launch

If you’re interested, just leave a reply to this post with the following info:

1. The device you’re using (iPhone 2G, iPod touch etc.)
2. Your chess experience level (beginner, club player, grand master etc.)
3. Any other relevant qualifications that would make you a great beta tester

Thanks for your interest – we’ll be in touch!

Update: beta applications are now closed, thanks to everyone who applied! We’ve had a great response and are really happy with the people who’ve registered.

We want your input! There are hundreds of things we’d like to do with the app, and we need help deciding where to spend our time. Vote in the poll, and if there’s something you’d like to see that’s not listed, let us know in the comments.

Magnus’s Online Chess was built without the two guys working on it ever meeting. We’re also in totally different timezones (USA & Australia). Ah the magic of the internet! Here’s how it happened, and a couple of the (free!) tools we used:

1. Set up a decent blog

Magnus worked on the app solo for a while and released version 1.0 in the app store. The app had great potential from the start, and a lot of people left really some positive reviews. But the app store was growing up fast, and Magnus’s Online Chess had some room to grow too.

Meanwhile, on the other side of the world, I was searching for a good chess app to buy. I bought version 1.0 of Magnus’s Online Chess, mainly because it connected to FICS, which is where I was playing chess at the time. I saw it had heaps of potential, and with a bit of UI tweaking could be a really cool app. I stumbled on Magnus’s blog, and emailed him out of the blue, offering to help.

At this stage, I had absolutely no idea who this Magnus guy was, but I think you can pretty much tell whether you’re going to get on with someone after you read their blog for about 5 minutes. I could tell from the posts and comments that Magnus was a friendly, helpful and passionate guy. He also had a clear vision: make the #1 chess app for the iPhone. Being a full time interactive design geek and part time chess player, it just so happened that I had exactly the same dream!

So I think the lesson here is this: set up a blog, and post some honest stuff on it. You’ll attract like-minded people.

As far as specific tools go, we’re using wordpress, which is awesome.

2: Use email (duh!)

OK this one’s pretty obvious. I worked on various parts of the interface, emailing graphics to Magnus, who implemented them in the app. It turns out, gmail is a pretty decent way to collaborate on projects like this. The (virtually) unlimited attachment sizes & threaded conversations are really handy. And the fact that you never have to delete a message means you can look back in time easily.

3. Issue tracking when things get more complicated

The gmail thing was working pretty well, but it was easy to lose track of things. If I sent an email to Magnus with 17 different bugs or features,  it was easy for 1 or 2 of them to get lost in the shuffle. After a bit of research, we settled on Lighthouse to manage our shared to-do list. It’s a great web app I’d recommend to anyone working on something like this. You can assign issues back and forth to each other, give things priorities, share files, the works. Oh yeah and it’s also free! (with limitations).

4. Sharing larger files

We pretty quickly hit the file size limitation on the free account for Lighthouse. Being poor iPhone developers, we set up a gspace account to send files back and forth. It’s another great free way to work remotely, which basically sets up a sort of virtual drive that you can access with a firefox extension. This is how we started to send all our files back and forth. I’d upload graphics (PNGs) into a folder called “graphics”, and like magic, in a few days, Magnus would add a new version of the app in a “builds” folder. It was like the shoemaker and the elves. Except with iPhones.

So there you have it, that’s how we’ve been working on the app for the past four months!

I am officially extending an open invitation to anyone at FICS: if you want help with a redesign, I’ll do it for free!

You might say “Ollie, it’s a great functional chess server, who cares what their website looks like?”. Well maybe you’d be right. But the way I see it, chess has been margnialized for too long. Let’s face it, when people think of chess, they think of some combination of the following:

• Boring
• Nerdy
• Complicated
• Inaccessible

Well OK, I’m personally at least 3 of the things on that list myself, but nevertheless, the FICS website is implicitly reinforcing all of those bad stereotypes.

I think chess needs to get back to the mainstream. And what better way to do it than an awesome iPhone chess client for FICS! Well that’s what Magnus and I have been working on for the last few months. People with iPhones expect a certain level of polish, and that’s what we’ve been aiming for.

Aesthetic issues with FICS out of the way, I still highly recommend heading over to their website and registering. It’s super easy and quick. Some good reasons to do so include:

1. It’s free! You don’t have to pay a cent.
2. There are heaps of people to play – 300,000 registered users in total and normally over 1,000 every day. That is a lot of people
3. Magnus’s Online Chess connects to FICS so you can play on it anywhere you have your iPhone and a net connection.

Yes, the third point is the really important one

1. Communicate that this is a chess app
2. Stand out from all the other chess apps (!)
3. Somehow communicate that our app is all about online chess (our point of difference)
4. Look super awesome and slick

Every chess app seems to use a knight in it’s icon. There’s a good reason for that, the knight is generally the best looking piece in any given set. But to avoid blending in, we deliberately decided to avoid doing the same.

We started with some paper scribbles (like we do with everything). There were a few early options:

• A pawn/wifi transmitter hybrid
• Pieces flying around the world (to show moves being sent back and forth)
• A board that was dissolving into “cyber-ey looking” pixels
• Some kind of king/M composition that (to imply the word Magnus)

We decided that communicating the online aspect was more important than any tie ins with the name, so the last one was out. The flying pieces were a bit fiddly at small size, and the dissolving board seemed a bit too nerdy, so we settled on the “pawn antenna”.

The icon was actually the start of lots of things, including the final colour scheme. We wanted something that fit well with the rest of the iPhone OS, and felt a bit dark and serious, maybe even a bit nerdy (hey, it IS a chess app, who are we kidding)

Here’s the final icon in a few different sizes, and in context on the home screen.

One potential issue – the use of wifi style radio waves might confuse people – will people understand that you can play on 3G as well? What do you think? Let us know in the comments

How close? Close enough for us to be getting excited! We’re aiming for release some time in October 2009 (depending on Apple’s approval process).

We’ve spent the last few months working hard, trying to make the best possible chess app for the iPhone. Here are the main things we’ve been concentrating on:

• Online multiplayer against real people
• Lots of opponents to choose from (at all skill levels)
• Powerful matchmaking
• Strong AI opponents
• Keep track of your rating / ranking
• Simple interface and beautiful graphics

It’s gonna be a massive step up from the previous version, in fact in lots of ways it’s almost like a whole new app. Keep an eye on this blog for updates!

Over the next few weeks we’ll be posting some insights into the dev process.
Keep an eye out if you’re interested in how we built the app